Saturday, December 4

64. Cat Among the Pigeons (1959)

*Spoilers*

Hi Agatha,

As I finished this one a bit ago, my daughter said, "Has there ever been an Agatha book you didn't like?"  No, I don't think so.  Maybe some of the occultish stories weren't my favorite, but I just feel like you hit it out of the park every single time.

I enjoyed the setting of this one, a prestigious girls' school called Meadowbank.

I enjoyed the fact that the culprit was a woman - sorry if that's a spoiler, but it says so on the back of the book, and really, what can you expect from a cast that is 95% female?

I enjoyed the humor.  It can be subtle, but it always makes me smile.

I was so involved in the story that I was surprised at the appearance of Poirot 2/3 of the way through the book.  I had completely forgotten it was a Poirot novel, and even checked back at the front cover.  I thought one of the girls would solve the mystery (and pretty much one did).  But Hercules came to put all the threads together and wrap it all up.

There was a lot going on in this one plot-wise, and while I typically don't enjoy political, war-related, coup-related, whatever-type stuff, I did enjoy this, and was hoping until the very end that the prince and his pilot weren't really dead.

Now, Agatha, I'm off to read my final book for my reading challenge for 2021 - and it's set at Christmastime!  Christmas is three weeks from today!  Woot woot!

My heart is happy.  

b.

Saturday, November 27

63. Ordeal by Innocence (1958)

 Dear Agatha,

Apparently I read this 8 years ago this month for the reading circle I joined for about... 2 books.  I think I enjoyed it more the first time, to be honest, although I still loved this read.  It just felt repetitious in spots to me this time.

Being an adoptive parent (I wasn't in 2013 and it wasn't even remotely something I had considered), this struck me:

It was an article of faith with her (Rachel Argyle) that the blood tie didn't matter.  But the blood tie does matter, you know.  There is usually something in one's own children, some kink of temperament, some way of feeling that you recognize and can understand without having to put into words.  You haven't got that tie with children you adopt. One has no instinctive knowledge of what goes on in their minds. You judge them, of course, by yourself, by your own thoughts and feelings, but it's wise to recognize that those thoughts and feelings may be very widely divergent from theirs. -- Leo Argyle

Food for thought, anyway.

Again, a wild and inventive plot, wonderful characters, a twisty road, and great fun.

Always,

b.

Friday, November 19

62. What Mrs. McGillicuddy Saw! (1957)

 {also published as 4.50 from Paddington}


Dear Agatha,

You know, oftentimes when you read a lot of books, a lot of plots seem to get recycled.  "There is nothing new under the sun," Solomon said, and a lot of times it feels like the story you are reading you have read a hundred times before, and many of those times the author is unapologetic about it.  Nevertheless, I have never read any plot before like these two books I read this week.  This is amazing, Agatha.

One of the many things you do well, Agatha, is create likable, strong female characters.  Miss Marple, honestly, is not one of my favorites, but she didn't annoy me in this book, and I loved Lucy Eyelesbarrow.  Even old Mrs. McGillicuddy was pretty cute.

On another note, someone on Goodreads posted this in their review and it made me laugh out loud:

I always forget about that brief section in 4:50 from Paddington that feels like the beginning of the dreaded story problem: “if two trains are traveling…”

description

On a practical note, zero stars for the publisher of the edition I got, Pocket Books by Simon & Schuster.  There were numerous typos - once they called our Jane Miss MarBle! - and there were about half a dozen pages which were folded and bound in that way... strange and annoying!

I have missed you!

b.

Thursday, June 10

61. Dead Man's Folly (1956)

 Oh, dear Agatha ~ I loved this book so much!

Ro and Grace and I just watched a season (there was only one, sadly) of Whodunnit on TV, about a group of strangers who gather at a mansion and one by one are killed off, until only one remains, and the killer himself/herself.  It was a lot of fun to watch together - and no, we couldn't solve this either.  So when I picked up my next Christie novel to find that Ms. Ariadne Oliver had constructed a Murder Hunt - similar enough, I would say, I was really excited.

I had actually jotted several references to quotes that I greatly enjoyed, but it was destroyed by flood (or a leaky water glass) and I lost the references.  I do not have the time today to go back and look.  One I remember and two more I came across after the flood.  The first, Poirot's opinion on shorts:

Poirot nodded absently.  He was reflecting, not for the first time, that seen from the back, shorts were becoming to very few of the female sex.  He shut his eye in pain.  Why, oh why, must young women array themselves thus? Those scarlet thighs were singularly unattractive!

Seems Ariadne Oliver's thoughts on Scotland Yard haven't changed in 20 years, when she had similar ideas in Cards on the Table:

"Oh, the police," said Mrs. Oliver.  "Now if a woman were the head of Scotland Yard..."

But my favorite quote from this book, I honestly found full of truth and had a complete affinity with it (for it?):

Assessed correctly, each had its particular place in a particular universe.  Assembled in their proper place in their particular universe, they not only made sense, they made a picture. In other words, Hercule Poirot was doing a jigsaw puzzle.

He looked down at where a rectangle still showed improbably shaped gaps. It was an occupation he found soothing and pleasant.  It brought disorder into order.  It had, he reflected, a certain resemblance to his own profession.  There, too, one was faced with various improbably shaped and unlikely facts which, though seeing to bear no relationship to each other, yet did each have its properly balanced part in assembling the whole.  His fingers deftly picked up an improbable piece of dark grey and fitted it into a blue sky.  It was, he now perceived, part of an aeroplane.

"Yes," murmured Poirot to himself, "that is what one must do.  The unlikely piece here, the improbable piece there, the oh-so-rational piece that is not what it seems; all of these have their appointed place, and once they are fitted in, eh bien! there is an end of the business! All is clear.  All is - as they say nowadays - in the picture." 

He fitted in, in rapid succession, a small piece of a minaret, another piece that looked as though it was part of a striped awning and was actually the backside of a cat, and a missing piece of sunset that had changed with Turneresque suddenness from orange to pink.

If I weren't headed to Colorado in the morning, with about a million things left to do to get ready, I'd probably get out a jigsaw puzzle.  Maybe even listen to a Christie audio book as I work on it.  That would be different.

~ me

Monday, May 24

60. Hickory Dickory Death (1955)

 {also published as Hickory, Dickory, Dock}


Dear Agatha,

Hickory, dickory, dock, the mouse ran up the clock.  The police said, "Boo," I wonder who, will eventually stand in the Dock?

Twisty, twisty, twisty.  When you know it can't be X, because it's too obvious, so you suspect Y, Z, and A through E, and then we get right back to X again.  Bad person, that X.  

Glad I never resided at 26 Hickory Road.  What an absolute mess.

Thanks for the fun,

b.

Monday, May 17

59. Destination Unknown (1954)

 {also published as So Many Steps to Death}


Ah, Agatha ~

This book... hmmm...

I loved Hilary and her story, and the book was interesting enough for me to keep on because I wanted to see how that all would turn out, but... this one... this one I'm not sure stands the test of time.  Or perhaps it does, but I am just not a fan of whatever genre this is.  A mystery, yes - and even a murder thrown in at the end - but the politics / conspiracy / spy / take-over-the-world genre... not really my favorite.

But no worries... I have many more to go.

Respectfully,

b.



Monday, May 10

58. A Pocket Full of Rye (1953)

 Dear Agatha,

It's been awhile.  It's been awhile since I have read anything, but I have especially missed you.  I've worked.  We've moved.  In fact, I'm not sure where my next Christie even is... 

But this book was sure a wonderful one to return to.  I loved how you used an innocent nursery rhyme as a blueprint for a murder mystery.  I read someone used the term "rhyme crime" and you've certainly used that pattern before and again, but I love it and find it wonderful.  The whole conflict between the innocence of childhood and the that wickedness of adults is such a perfect tension.

From Goodreads:  Librarian's note: this is one of 13 books in the Miss Marple series, which includes twelve novels and one collection of short stories - "The Thirteen Problems." There are a total of 20 short stories about Miss M, seven of which can be found in other collections. Entries for each of the novels and short stories can be found on Goodreads.

Sing a song of sixpence,
A pocket full of rye.
Four and twenty blackbirds,
Baked in a pie.

When the pie was opened
The birds began to sing;
Wasn't that a dainty dish,
To set before the king.

The king was in his counting house,
Counting out his money;
The queen was in the parlour,
Eating bread and honey.

The maid was in the garden,
Hanging out the clothes,
When down came a blackbird
And pecked off her nose.

Thanks again, Dame Agatha,

b.